As Todd Dills and I discussed for his 2021 story “Just say no: One owner-operator's approach to broker/customer demands to be 'additional insured'," brokers and customers frequently require that they be added to our policy as an additional insured. This is a covert means to gain free insurance from us as well as avoid financial responsibility when or if they cause us bodily injury or property damage. Personally, as an independent owner-operator myself, I choose to never do business with any broker or customer who, as a condition in the agreement or contract, requires to be added to my policy as an additional insured.
A lesser-known, but even worse, condition often included in a broker or customer’s agreement or contract is a waiver of subrogation. Many are completely unaware of the potential adverse consequences of providing a waiver of subrogation to a broker or customer. Subrogation is a legal tool used by an insurance company to recover losses it paid out to an insured (a claim) from a liable third party who is responsible for those losses. I know that is a bit wordy and complicated. So let’s first start with the definition of subrogation itself.
In the Merriam-Webster dictionary, subrogation is defined as “the assumption by a third party (such as a second creditor or an insurance company) of another's legal right to collect a debt or damages.”
When discussing insurance, and specifically an insurance policy, a waiver of subrogation is an endorsement. Similar to a COI (certificate of insurance), the insurance carrier will provide a copy of the waiver of subrogation to the broker or customer who has requested and been granted the waiver. The best way to show the dangers of granting a waiver of subrogation is by example. Let’s use the same example I used in Dills’s “Just say no” story referenced above. Here’s how Todd summed that up:
An owner-op checks in at his direct customer's facility. "They say back into door 37," Baker said, and "door 37 has an overhang outside of it." While the owner-op's backed in, "the overhang collapses and lands on his trailer." The customer then claims "hey, we didn't give you that door," saying the owner-op misheard 37 instead of 57. "It's not our fault. You need to contact your insurance company." The owner-op submits a physical damage claim to his own insurance, yet manages to provide sufficient proof to the insurance company that the failed dock overhang was in fact the one that the shipper sent him to. The insurance company says, "Hey, ACME Widgets Inc., you’re responsible. Pay up or we'll sue" for the cost of the loss. In the case of a broker asking to be added as an additional insured, keep in mind, too, that given possible affiliations that broker has with bigger businesses, you may be giving away more than you think.
For the sake of this article, let’s say the broker or customer was not added to the owner-operator’s policy as an additional insured. However, they did require and were provided a waiver of subrogation. Notice the underlined section above? That is precisely what subrogation is. Now if we give the broker or customer a waiver of subrogation then our insurance company can not force Acme Widgets, Inc. to reimburse them (our insurance company) for the settlement of the claim.
Why does that matter? Because that claim and settlement will now be a permanent black mark on our insurance history by appearing on both our loss runs and CLUE (Comprehensive Loss Underwriting Exchange) reports. Loss runs are a report of claims history on a given policy. A CLUE report is generally a report containing up to seven years of personal-auto and personal-property claims history and up to a five-year commercial loss run history. Insurance companies rely heavily on both of these reports when they determine if they can provide a quote for coverage, and if they do provide a quote, what the premium for that quote will be.
